|  |  | On the morning of the twenty eighth we slept.  It was a good thing, 
		we told ourselves;  the eyes grow weary with looking at new things;  
		sleeping late, we said, has its genuine therapeutic value; we would be 
		better for it, would be able to work more effectively.  We have 
		little doubt that all this was true, but we wish we could build as good 
		a rationalization every time we are lazy.
 For in some beastly way this 
		fine laziness has got itself a bad name.  It is easy to see how it 
		might have come into disrepute if the result of laziness were hunger.  
		But it rarely is.  Hunger makes laziness impossible.  It has 
		even become sinful to be lazy.  We wonder why.   One could argue, particularly if one had a gift for laziness, that is 
		is a relaxation pregnant of activity, a sense of rest from which 
		directed effort may arise, whereas most busy-ness is merely a kind of 
		nervous tick. We know a lady who is obsessed with the idea of ashes in an ashtray.  
		She is not lazy.  She spends a good half of her waking time making 
		sure that no ashes remain in any ashtray, and to make sure of keeping 
		busy she has a great many ashtrays.  Another acquaintance, a man, 
		straightens rugs and pictures and arranges books and magazines in neat 
		piles.  He is not lazy either;  he is very busy.  To what 
		end? If he should relax and, perhaps with his feet up on a chair and a 
		glass of cool beer beside him - not cold, but cool - if he should 
		examine from this position a rumpled rug or a crooked picture, saying to 
		himself between sips of beer (preferably Carta Blanca beer), "This rug 
		irritates me for some reason.  If it were straight, I should be 
		comfortable;  But there is only one straight position (and this is 
		of course, only my own personal discipline of straightness) among all 
		possible positions.  I am, in effect, trying to impose my will, my 
		insular sense of rightness, on a rug,  which of itself can have no 
		such sense, since it seems equally contented straight or crooked. Suppose I should try to straighten people", and here he sips deeply.  
		"Helen C., for instance is not neat, and Helen C." - and here he goes 
		into a reverie - "how beautiful she is with her hair messy,  how 
		lovely when she is excited and breathing through her mouth."  Again 
		he raises his glass, and in a few minutes he picks up the telephone.  
		He is happy;  Helen C. may be happy; and the rug is not disturbed 
		at all. How can such a process have become a shame and a sin.  Only in 
		laziness can one achieve a state of contemplation which is a balancing 
		of values, a weighing of oneself against the world and the world against 
		itself. A busy man cannot find the time for such balancing.  We do not 
		think a lazy man can commit murders, not great thefts, nor lead a mob.  
		He would be more likely to think about it and laugh.  And a nation 
		of lazy contemplative men would be incapable of fighting a war unless 
		their very laziness were attacked.  Wars are the activities of 
		busy-ness. With such a background of reasoning, we slept until nine A.M. |